I have found a very good new website. I have not posted a few things because William N. Grigg of Pro Libertate (Latin for “…for freedom”) from Payette, Idaho has covered them so well. Mr. Grigg describes himself as a Christian Individualist, husband, father and self-appointed pundit. I like that, as I call myself the self-appointed Bard.
Mr. Grigg writes, very well, and he does in-depth investigative reporting. He has followed up on the Baltimore riots with “Nickel Rides,” “Houdini Suicides,” and the American Torture State. In that article, he introduced me to a concept called “screen check” where police officers quickly slam on the breaks causing the handcuffed person in the box to smash into the screen. “Yup the screen (that separates the back seat from the front seat) is still good.” Houdini suicides refers to the point that there have been a number of American citizens, taken into custody, handcuffed in the back of a police cop car, who have “shot themselves in the head” with a gun which the police officer failed to find. All internal police investigations clear the police officers.

William N. Grigg of Pro Libertate
He wrote a wonderfully in-depth article titled “This is America”: The Day Police Firebombed West Philadelphia covering when the government firebombed a group of Americans of African descent and caused 60 homes to go up in flames. None of the people involved with burning down 60 innocent people’s homes, or gunning down the children of the group The MOVE trapped in the home as they tried to flee were even brought up on charges. Five out of six children murdered by police as they tried to escape a burning building. This incident is years before the Ruby Ridge or Waco Texas. You find out that The MOVE in West Philadelphia was where the FBI perfected the tactics of burning families out. As I said, be concern how the police state treats people in America’s ghettos because that is how they will be treating you tomorrow. Until Mark Levin and Pat Buchanan (and any other police state apologist) reads these articles and explains how this information is not valid, or explains how this behavior is Christian and constitutional please stop your instinctive defense of the authoritarian police state. However, none of those insightful investigative pieces is the one I keep rereading.
The piece that is the most disturbing to me is Gary Raney, Oath Breaker. It shows in incredible detail how the Idaho State Police, threaten and then successfully ran a patriot legislator out of office and threaten several others for opposing the growth of the police state in Idaho. The Sheriff from Ada County Gary Raney, who told Obama he would enforce any law that Obama and his CZARs passed including gun confiscation. The Patriot lawmaker was Rep. Mark Patterson. The issue was HB 219, which would have made it a misdemeanor offense for any peace officer in the state of Idaho to participate in federal civilian disarmament initiatives. The Idaho State Police led by Sheriff Gary Raney opposed that language. State Representative Mark Patterson supported it.
The Idaho State Police found a 40-year-old case when a 21-year old Mark Patterson was charged with rape, where he pleaded out. Five years later Mark Patterson would challenge the case and have the ruling vacated because the women recanted her assertion, was mentally disabled and had lost custody of her five children due to her mental state. None of that mattered to the Idaho State Police led by Sheriff Gary Raney. They smear this now 60-year-old patriot politician because he dared to limit the power of the police state. And you know what the “good conservative Republican” voters in Idaho did? They ran State Representative Mark Patterson out of office as a rapist. Every patriot politician saw and understood the power of the police state and the knee-jerk support many conservative authoritarians have for the police.
There appears to be an issue with the Idaho State Police that patriots in Idaho may want to look at more closely. Former Ada county Sheriff Gary Raney has now “retired” to a golden parachute federal deal arranged by Attorney General Holder working at National Institute of Corrections. And using his Obama / Holder connections he was recently appointed to the Washington-based Pretrial Justice Institute (PJI), a public-private partnership within the prison-industrial complex.
This site has been attacked by tyrannical foreign governments, Obama-era federal agencies, candidates for governor, and multiple progressive outlets. Progressives seem to hate any black conservative who walks off the liberal “woke” plantation. Social Media Internet ghettos have greatly diminished distribution of our content. This is called “Shadow-banning.” Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Also please support our ability to continue to bring you a different perspective. Donate here. Another way to support us and show your spirit is to purchase CCS Partisan merchandise. Thank you.
Did he?
Excellent…
Armored vehicles in the hands of the local cop shop is a stupid joke. (Ask any tanker.) They’re clumsy, slow, have limited mobility, are surprsingly fragile and a nightmare to use and maintain without dedicated training and support facilities and staff. Armored up Humvees, MRAPs and APCs aren’t designed for civilian law enforcement. There are a lot of places they can’t go and plenty more where they’ll simply get stuck if they try.
They tend to give their occupants a false sense of security. The SWAT team has to dismount at some point, leaving them more vulnerable than they would have been if they’d simply driven several unmarked cars to the site.
Sheriffs like armor because it looks cool at Open House Day. They give the uninformed the impression that they’re Doing Something Serious About Crime while the kids climb all over the things. (The reality is that they’ve gotten the local taxpayers to pay for the upkeep on a *loaned* DOD vehicle that can be recalled to the military at any time.) They’re vulnerable to any number of improvised measures. (A retired tank commander once told me that his M60 was immobilized after a long strand of barbed wire got wound up in the sprocket, nearly throwing a tread. It took hours for him and his crew to cut and clear out the mess.)
Not to sound too provocative, but one of the last weapons still produced as the Third Reich crumbled into the preindustrial era was the Panzerfaust 150. Properly used, it would destroy any armored vehicle of the time. It was moron simple, disposable and was churned out by “cottage industry.” Production began *two months* before the war ended. JBTs take note.
Let the Sheriff have his toys. It keeps him from thinking about things that might cause problems.
Alex,
Here is my suggestion for Jack Booted Thug statist of the week:
New Jersey Dem Whose Sons Committed Armed Robbery Wants to Restrict Online Ammo Sales
Barack Obama’s anti-gun allies in Congress are moving right now to effectively OUTLAW your freedom to purchase ammunition online.
“The “Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act of 2015″ was just introduced last week and it already has 30 cosponsors.
This crippling new law would:
FORCE you to submit a photo ID in-person every time you purchase any ammunition;
REPORT you to Obama’s anti-gun U.S. Attorney General and local law enforcement if you purchase more than 1,000 rounds within a five day period;
REGISTER ammunition buyers like you in a database maintained by Obama’s bureaucrats at the Department of Justice.” Source: NRA ILA email dated May 20
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2015/05/18/new-jersey-dem-wants-to-restrict-online-ammo-sales-n2000534
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/05/foghorn/breaking-nj-dem-introduces-stop-online-ammunition-sales-act/
“In 1986, even the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms admitted the failure of federal ammunition regulation. In a February 10, 1986 BATF memo that made it into the House of Representatives hearings report on the Firearm Owners Protection Act, BATF Director Steve Higgins lists the elimination of “Ammunition Licensing and Recordkeeping” as one of the “Positive Aspects” of the bill. The memo states, “The Bureau and the Department have recognized that current recordkeeping requirements for ammunition have no substantial law enforcement value. In addition, their elimination would remove an unnecessary recordkeeping burden from licensees.””
Fair use source: https://www.nraila.org/articles/20150515/anti-gun-lawmakers-seek-to-stop-online-ammunition-sales
“But Coleman’s bill goes further, requiring any purchase of more than 1000 rounds within 5 days be reported to the U.S. Attorney General. Not only does this require more government record keeping, it smells an awful lot like tracking gun ownership.
The BATFE (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives) is specifically prohibited by law from maintaining a list of firearm owners. But if an individual regularly purchases .223 caliber or 5.56mm ammunition, it’s a pretty safe bet he owns one or more of the dreaded AR-15 ‘assault rifles’.” http://unclesamsmisguidedchildren.com/dems-push-ban-online-ammo-sales/
“(C) Each licensee shall prepare a report of multiple sales or other dispositions whenever the licensee sells or otherwise disposes of, at one time or during any 5 consecutive business days, more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition to an unlicensed person. The report shall be prepared on a form specified by the Attorney General and forwarded to the office specified thereon and to the department of State police or State law enforcement agency of the State or local law enforcement agency of the local jurisdiction in which the sale or other disposition took place, not later than the close of business on the day that the multiple sale or other disposition occurs.”.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2283/text
A quote from Mr. Grigg’s excellent article:
“Raney’s invocation of the supposed duty to execute the will of the central government, however odious, brought to mind an editorial published a while ago by the Telegraph and Democrat Review of Alton, Illinois:
“The law in question may be defective – it may, in some particulars, be unnecessarily severe; its operation may, in a few cases, prove oppressive, perhaps unjust. But so long as it shall remain on the statute book of the United States, it will be the bounden duty of every good citizen to interpose no resistance to its execution.”
That editorial was published on November 22, 1850, and the law to which it referred was the Fugitive Slave Act, under which local sheriffs and constables of Gary Raney’s ilk tracked down human beings who had fled from chattel slavery – or free black men who were falsely described as “escaped slaves” — and delivered them into the hands of others who claimed to own them.
If Idaho had been part of the Union in 1850, and Gary Raney had been Sheriff of Ada County, he would have enforced the Fugitive Slave Law with the same avidity he has displayed in enforcing the federal narcotics laws that are distant but undeniable kindred to that repellent measure.”
Fair use source: http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2015/04/gary-raney-oath-breaker.html
That is a very good point. There are many, many people who not only rejected the Federal governments ungodly and unconstitutional Fugitive Slave Act, but physically fought against it. Thankfully he is no longer sheriff, I hear there is an issue with Idaho Kootenai county’s sheriff. He just spent a lot of money on a tank. Yes, a “armored vehicle.”
Protip from a cop turned criminal defense attorney:
1) If you are arrested, invoke by name, your Constitutional right to remain silent, e.g., “I invoke all my rights under the Constitution, including my right to remain silent. I will answer no questions and make no statements. I want a lawyer.”
2) If possible, complain clearly and publically (if possible) that you are suffering from crushing chest pain that is radiating into your left arm and left neck and jaw. State clearly that you think you’re having a heart attack. Repeat as necessary.
Otherwise, SHUT UP.
As you are in custody, it is incumbent on your custodians to provide you with health care, including emergency services. A complaint of chest pain will almost certainly lead to an ER visit and an overnight admission to a chest pain unit so that a heart attack can be excluded. This provides you with time to consider your situation in an place less stressful than jail and for a lawyer to become involved in your defense.
I know this is going to be seen as an abuse of the medical system, but I’m simply repeating what many criminals (and their attorneys) already know.
There are only 3 types of cops. 1 was the playground bully, who has found a way to make a living at it. 2 was the playground victim of the bully, who now has “authority”, a gun and a badge. 3 (an endangered species) the peace officer, who is motivated by decency and public concern. It is my belief that one must question the motivations of those in ANY public position. Consider any law enforcement, be it judge, prosecutor, or cop, who demands the “right” to make mistakes, yet makes a living prosecuting, persecuting those who allegedly do. The presumption of innocence is bullshit. You are not arrested on that premise. The outcome of allegations is determined by the depth of your pocketbook. The poor can not afford a Gerry Spence, F lee Bailey, Johnny Cochran, Clarence Darrow. Public pretenders are all part of the revenue generating machine that has replaced the “justice” system. If they were any good, they would be partners in a firm. I am fighting a DUI I received on PRIVATE PROPERTY, out of my pickup, no keys on person. I have been piss tested 8 times a month for something I have yet to be convicted of at 20 bucks a whack to pay for a voyeur to watch my cock. The 4th and 5th amendments be damned, and I have to pay for the “privilege”. .
The DUI laws are perfect examples of out of control government. If you crawl into your truck, realize you are too drunk to drive, get in the passenger’s seat to sleep it off. You are guilty. If you decide to walk or bike it home and not drive, you are guilty of drunk in public. Everyone knows that booze impacts people differently but we judge “drunk” by the some government decided limit. IF you are 6’8″ 340, your BAC is judge the same if you are 5’1″ 130 pounds. In other states (not Idaho) they can stop you for no reason and no suspicion and search you in DUI checkpoints, the Supreme Court has said “constitutional” because we don’t like drunk drivers. And there is this little organization full of hateful women called Mother’s Against Drunk Drivers that spends a lot of money to keep expanding the meaning of DUI and the laws. Good Christian Republican voters vote for more and more of these authoritarian laws.
Yes drunk driving is a menace, and we should protect ourselves, but as normal, have we gone too far? The answer is almost always yes. We have gone too far for … good reasons. Normally to protect the “children” or to protect us from “little brown people.”
Not sure about your particular case, but I understand the much of the DUI laws in this nation are just another example of a completely out of control government. Oh by the way, a DUI in most cities brings in approximately 10K of revenue to the city. It jams your insurance rates, and goes on your record impacting your ability to get work. Be prepared to be more of a economic slave than normal.